Monday, July 04, 2005

The Risks of Blogging

I got an e-mail this morning from the ex I lovingly refer to as “The Troll”. The guy refuses to give up; I find that adorable, but not enough to help us overcome the problems that destroyed the relationship.

As I’ve stated before, pretty much all the guys that date me are certifiably crazy or have some severe physical/social disability. The troll was definitely the nicest of all these carnies. He liked me, and he was smart, interested in things, and laughed at my jokes…

…until you introduced other people. Then he withdrew completely. His neck disappeared, he stared at the floor, he shuffled as he walked, and he looked exactly like the desert troll he was when not alone with me. He was also painfully, searingly pale skinned. One mole on his cheek was the only available pigment. That fact never bothered me until he was annoyingly absent in social situations.

On one of the last days we spent together, we were debating this problem. Well, I debated while he watched television in my apartment. Occasionally, during commercials, I would get a stammered response, generally along the lines, of (and prepare yourself, women, for the great romance) “well, we can, like, I don’t know, uh, figure it out when, we’re, uh, like, together. For a long time, y’know.”

I am sorry to let the single girls know that such flowery language is possible from a man proposing a lifetime of togetherness. I finally went over, stood between him and the TV, leaned down to obstruct his line of sight, and said, “I need to know right now why you think we will ever get past this problem.”

He glanced over my shoulder to the TV. Satisfied that he wasn’t missing a Farscape re-run, he replied, “Look! I’m not good with words. I like to write.”

I acquiesced, “Okay, write it down for me, then.”

He muttered something about his blog. (Yes, it was The Troll who introduced me to the concept 6 months before Cate suggested it. In one of those great moments of irony, I had turned up my nose at the idea, claiming it was voyeuristic and inappropriate to write your thoughts for strangers to read. Go ahead. Take a moment to laugh.) The show roared back to life, so Troll sank into himself. I angrily finished the dishes before plopping on the couch, well out of reach.

That night, I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt (this is my great failure in relationships – I’m too quick to forgive). I logged onto his blog, the place where he had assured me I could find access to his innermost thoughts. He wrote, “Last week, Nick Berg was beheaded. My heart is filled with the anguish of the family.”

Difficult to believe, but I didn’t find that very comforting. And yet, I gave him a second chance. The next day, he wrote about the McDonald’s lawsuit. The day after that? Television. No e-mail arrived and our live conversations were as though the discussion had never happened.

When I finally brought it up again, he stammered his way through an explanation that he thought I was “over it.” I was not, I informed him.

We survived another several weeks because I really did care for him, but, in the end, I couldn’t imagine being with someone who was incapable of communicating with me through whichever media he chose. Then there was the pesky not helping thing (yeah, he’s the same guy I dumped for being useless – I mentioned there was a little bit more to that story). In case you were wondering, there is not one mention of me anywhere on the blog where he supposedly writes his deepest feelings.

But he still e-mails every few months to ask if “I’ve changed my mind about the marriage thing.” A true romantic, that one. Maybe one day, I’ll be done wanting more and he’ll finally get me (I could do worse, and have. At least he didn’t police every bite in my mouth and compare me to whichever model he wished I were that day – yeah, gotta love the motorcycle guy for that complex).

‘Til then, I’m afraid I haven’t changed my mind.

68 comments:

omar said...

“well, we can, like, I don’t know, uh, figure it out when, we’re, uh, like, together. For a long time, y’know.”

He stole that line from me! As someone who also doesn't talk in public or help out around the house, I've got to say, I don't see a problem with his behavior.

omar said...

(Yes, I could have included this in the last comment. But I'm going for sheer volume this week.)

I took my moment to laugh, and I'm still laughing about you calling blogging "voyeuristic and inappropriate." We know your bra size. :)

And I think the blog story about McDonald's was just a metaphor for his relationship with you. Sometimes, you've got to read between the lines, glo. Read between the lines.

Kristin said...

Hey Omar-what is the vole saying? My dial-up is too fuzzy...I can't read it.
So Glo-why did you break up with this guy? Ha ha, just kidding...you described him very well. Bravo for you being tough enough to do it...it'll pay off two-fold. (or more? Kevin Costner says that in 'Prince of Thieves'...I've always wanted to use it.)

glo said...

Yes, quite aware of the complete irony of it all. Sometimes I read his innocent blog and realize that *he* would be shocked by me now. It's a good think I find myself so freakin' hilarious...

Oh - and omar - get off the couch and help your wife! Or at least blog about how much you love her. Really, most women are open to all the communication options...Do you really not talk in public? What a shame. So many of us are bored silly in public that it would be real great to have a little vole/mad libs/future parent chat occasionally.

omar said...

I can't do everything on my vacation list AND help out around the house. Gimmie a break!

And how many times have I said on my site that I don't talk? Why don't people believe me? Oh wait, you got a 10% on the omarphillips.net quiz that was about me. Nevermind.

glo said...

Well, I'm actually very ladylike in public. I have never announced my bra size to the general public (except that day in Victoria's Secret and those ladies were asking for it). Yet, I am the voyeur extraordinaire on the web. So, we all have parts of our personality that we exploit thanks to the anonymity of the web.

Even if you don't talk, I'd still hang out with you. And I got a 100% on the dumber quiz, thank you very much.

omar said...

And Sam, the vole is saying "Pimpin' ain't easy." He's so inappropriate sometimes, honestly. And I like the new haircut!

glo - Oh, I forgot that you took the 2nd quiz (the remedial version, to be specific). And yes, we do all have parts we exploit on the web. In my case, it's my literacy.

Me, me, and more me. I'm pretty sure I'm above 10 vacation comments so far...

glo said...

I'm not complaining. I'm stuck in a nasty busy day at work, so comment away. I hope I make it home in time for the barbeque and fireworks, but I'm rapidly losing hope. I'm both bored and overstimulated - that's the kind of conundrum for which I'm famous.

Stephen said...

Wow, two blogs and a vole. I'm impressed.

glo said...

Yes, some people call it lifeless, others refer to it as vain - but I like to call it enterprising...

Thanks for stopping by. ;)

omar said...

Ew, nasty busy day at work? Sorry about that. Hopefully the rest of the week at work is better to you. Me, I'm on vacation, so I'd imagine my work week will be just fine.

Bill C said...

Omar - what's up? Are you on vacation or something?
And G.Lo - just...yeah. Great moments of irony. To say the least. Well done, as always.

cadiz12 said...

glo, good for you for getting rid of mr. mumbles. seriously, i get the whole shy/introvert thing, but when it's a topic that really means something to the guy, he'll find his voicebox and use it. sounds like he had some avoidance issues, too.

i had a similar situation, but to make it simple, just substitute 'balls' for 'voicebox.'

glo said...

Cadiz - I actually quite enjoy a shy guy if he can surface occasionally and be taken into public. Then his personality is like having a secret between the two of you. And you're right, 'Mr. Mumbles' could have saved the whole thing by not avoiding the issue (as he continues to do by e-mailing but never addressing the initial problem).

Oh - and ha, ha.

So, omar, are you on vacation? What a shock! I had no idea...

omar said...

Yeah, jam & glo, I wasn't sure if I had mentioned it or not. I'm on vacation all week. No wrk.

And cadiz has it right, I may not talk much, but when the right topic surfaces, I can be a blabbermouth.

Sarah Cate said...

You mean I wasn't the person who introduced you to blogging? Are you sure? I can feel pieces of my online construct crumbling as I type...

omar said...

Ouch. That's a tough way for you to find out about it too, cate. All along, she led you to believe you were the one...

Hey, how's wrk? HAHAHahahhahaahahaha

PDgirl said...

ew. i hate those conversations. The pattern is "Uh, um (insert some word here that relates to the conversation), well, just (word that relates), like because, (word), you know?"

I think they hand out cards at birth. "Awkward ommunication and how to master it."

glo said...

Sorry to crush you, Cate. You were the one that made blogging sound fun, doesn't that count?

Mel - hi again! And as I said on your blog, there's a very real chance that we're soul sisters. Try not to be frightened.

Sarah Cate said...

Small consolation, I suppose. At least you gave it a try based on my glowing recommendation - everything else I suggest gets so ignored!

Bill C said...

Cate - you have suggestions that aren't glowing recommendations? Such a-
Wait. Maybe I need to put that another way.

Sarah Cate said...

Wait. Did I just get insulted?

glo said...

I thought it was funny...

But I see that Jam is aware of a trial of mine - Cate is a voracious consumer of services. How can I possibly keep up with her recommendations? Okay, the Lord of the Scoundrel thing has no excuse, but the rest are certainly forgivable offenses.

Sarah Cate said...

Forgivable? I don't know how to respond to such a ridiculous assertion. Except...Have you ever watched any of the Sharpe series?

glo said...

Does "on my netflix list" count??

Sarah Cate said...

No. And you know it. "On my netflix list" - Bah! - that's worse than "it's in the mail." This hurts, you know. Hurts very deeply.

omar said...

Just strolling through again, with nothing to add.

Hi!

And cate, I've never even heard of the Sharpe series. (glo, I've created a diversion. Run!)

Bill C said...

Cate - don't think so, but I'm not sure. Might've hit my head when I fell.

Sarah Cate said...

Never heard of the Sharpe series!

Based on the books by Bernard Cornwell, British television series (of movies) from the 90's, set during the Napoleonic Wars and starring MY BOYFRIEND as "maverick rifleman Richard Sharpe". Fun stuff, very British, full of military and class humor and lots of improbable and wild derring-do and drama. It's great. And not just because it's one of the only good-guy roles Sean has ever had.

Bill C said...

So would that be a glowing recommendation, or a suggestion?

Sarah Cate said...

A suggestion that includes a glowing recommendation that includes enough information for you to decide for yourself. But G-Lo is contractually obligated to watch. This is MY BOYFRIEND we're talking about.

Bill C said...

I was going to start-up a weblog at thetroll.blogspot.com, but it's already gone.

Who would do that?!? Besides me, I mean.

glo said...

Using Omar's clever distraction, I skippd off to lunch, only to discover that the conversation hadn't advanced! Rotten luck!

Jam - that cracks me up. You are a riot, my friend. Now, I have to check it out. Perhaps my ex found a sense of humor...probably not, though.

MEP said...

You are definitely not missing out by refusing to settle for this guy. Communication is a two-way street and if it's not working for you then you are completely justified in wanting out.

Sarah Cate said...

G-Lo - you're not getting out of this one. I will mercilessly torment you until you 'fess up and post about it.

glo said...

Hey, MEP! I admit I was a little jealous of your story of excellent communication over on your blog; however, thanks for justifying me. There are some (ahem, ahem) who have dared to suggest I may be too picky.

All right, Cate, I will subject you to the conditions of friendship. I was going to write my patented rules to facing reality, but I can't stand the pressure any longer.

Sarah Cate said...

Oh, we can all face reality later. Hearing about your consistent failure to heed my recommendations will be much more fun. :-)

jazz said...

oh man. that guy sounds lame.

if you want him to find your blog (and i think he should. he'd be awed by the fact he thinks HE is the writer, and here you are, the talented funny one)...you should give the address to us so we can bombard it with lame comments.

you're done with the lame guy anyhow. what would it hurt? i'm just itching to cause trouble! ;)

glo said...

Evil, evil woman! Temptress of all that's good!

Not that I didn't think about it...perhaps if you promise to be VERY inappropriate all over his board...

Sarah Cate said...

I used to know what his site address was. But it was so boring, I forgot. Have searched in vain through all email from G-Lo for address and can't find it. Dangit!

glo said...

Hey! Cruelty, thy name is Cate!

Okay, it was dull, but he was a really nice guy. Sheesh. I'm feeling like some desperate chick now. He had so many good points, let's not forget that.

If you did see the blog, though, you would never believe the two of us went together AT ALL...but, hey, I'm a conundrum, remember.

Sarah Cate said...

I never said he wasn't nice. But I never met him, so I wouldn't know. ;-)

omar said...

You know, men can be quiet, obsessed with TV, and not help out while still being nice and respectful.

Not that I know anything about that.

glo said...

Thank you, Omar. My point exactly. And none of that other stuff bothered me when we were together, honestly. I like to be the center of attention (hard to believe, I know), so a quieter guy makes a lot of sense. He was comforting when we were alone, and very sweet (even though he wasn't romantic - that really doesn't matter in the end, except when I'm lampooning someone in a blog).

The problem came when I couldn't get him to come out of his shell when it mattered. That's a different story. You said yourself that if it matters, the guy can open up - and he couldn't.

However, he was a really great guy, which is why I would *never* give out his blog address.

omar said...

I said that when the right topic surfaces, I can be a blabbermouth. That wasn't meant to imply the topic is important or meaningful.

Maybe if Farscape came up more at parties, he'd be jabbering all night.

glo said...

Alas, no. He was terrified someone would discover a Sci-Fi geek in the making. Me, on the other hand, regales anyone listening with tales of the Sci-Fi convention Cate and I attended.

Seriously, Omar, when I finally give in to the guy, I'll tell him what a supporter you were. ;)

glo said...

Oh - and if I've sounded harsh or offensive, I'm sorry. I am no great prize, this I know, so I have no right sounding like I thought myself too good for anyone at all.

I do, however, require the courage to communicate. I am very straight-forward, no game player, and willing to ask for what I need, but I am too selfish to be self-sacrificing, so if I'm asking too much, then I think the fair thing is to terminate the 'romance'.

I suppose it sounds vain, but it's not meant to be so - I truly care about people and I hate seeing anyone stuck in a relationship where they are incapable of meeting their partner's needs. That just seems cruel.

Anyway, when will I learn not to write break-up stories??? They never turn out well for me.

omar said...

Hold on now, I'm not saying I'm on this guy's side. I'm just saying I happen to know an awesomely awesome guy who is quiet in public. He's awesome though. And HOTT.

I'm still on your side though. Observe:

Go glo! Drop that zero and get with a hero!

See?

glo said...

Well, the redundancy and the double 't' can overcome a lot of social inhibition (once again, was not so much social inhibition as unwillingness to discuss problem that cursed the relationship).

I didn't mean to upset your friend who has no idea who I am. Seriously, I like the shy ones, too. It makes sense given my extroverted nature - the stories of my attempt to hook up with the fellow extrovert are truly terrifying. Let your friend know that we not-so-hot but outgoing chicks are still within his reach. Seriously, tell your friend to look me up. ;) (Funny, funny, flirty Glo)

And thanks for the cheer BTW - didn't know you had a closet Laker Girl in ya.

glo said...

Does your "friend" feel better now?

omar said...

My friend does feel better now, yes. But he's married (which is how he got the second "T"). The good ones are always taken. Like my friend. What a catch.

omar said...

I feel a little bit like jon today (I think of it as paying my respects to him while he can't be here, since he's on a real vacation). Between yesterday and today, I've set all kinds of commenting records in the state of NY.

glo said...

Alas, story of my life. I suppose he also has an adorable baby or some such crap. If he's also a girly gardener, I'm afraid I'll have no other recourse but to throw myself into the nearest river. Despair is an ugly playmate...

jazz said...

commenting records? where are such records so you can prove this claim of yours?

i personally, need a guy who can handle his own with my friends. when they meet him and mess with him a bit, i need him to be able to mess with them back. to take being made fun of, to make fun of back. some shy guys just can't handle that. i don't mind a quiter guy, but i need one that can hold his own...

jazz said...

oh, and since i know i can find omar here: omar, were you serious that you'd play me for a day? i'm thinking of taking up digis idea of a guest host for a week or two. would you be up for playing me? i'm thinking i'd make everyone make up a story. will be fun for those that don't play with fiction much. you'd have to pretend you were me. it would be easier for girls, but i'm hoping there would be lots of fun disastrous dates, tech boyfriends, faux celebrity sightings, etc etc to read from other people. would you be up for the challenge? and glo, how bout you?

glo said...

It has been a long time since my comments turned into a conversation. Let's all bow our heads in respect...

Jas - given that I have 2 very quick-witted and slightly cruel brothers, this has been a concern of mine. Polo Dude, in particular, loves a victim and I'm loathe to provide him one.

glo said...

Sign me up. The wheels in my head are already turning. Oh, the fun you will have in your absence, my dear...

jazz said...

oooohh yay!!! i'm thinking i'll turn over the reigns in about a week, give it up for the next two weeks. i'm testing the waters to see who else would want to join, but i'd hate to post and ask, i want to be selective ;)

glo said...

I'll consider myself flattered, then. Just let me know when.

omar said...

I'd do it!!

And as for the commenting records, I maintain the record book at my house. In a locked safe. So you'll just have to take my word for it.

glo said...

Time for Li'l Glo to go home. I'll post something less controversial tonight...

cadiz12 said...

ooh guest hosting! this is gonna be exciting. i can't wait to see what you guys come up with.

glo are you serious about 'giving in?'

i mean, would you rather have a car with shiny rims, spoiler, leather seats and a kicking sound system that continually breaks down, or a pretty nice car that isn't too fancy but has all the essentials and won't leave you on the side of the road?

take it from someone who's been there: you deserve better.

glo said...

Not so certain that The Troll isn't the nice, comfortable car....for today, I'm not serious. But I'm impressed by anyone crazy enough to still think about me 14 months after a breakup. Trust me, I'm not really worth 10 minutes. You only think so because you get to see the edited version on the web.

The fancy car was definitely motorcycle guy who was all fast living, exciting adventures, lustful afternoons, and a whole boatload of cruelty.

MEP said...

G.LO - Thanks for the comment. You're not being to picky, if something doesn't work for you in a relationship. You shouldn't settle for the nice, comfortable car if it doesn't give you a bit of the butterflies that you look for in a fancy car. You can hold out for the Infiniti that offers both and promises to be there forever. :D

Ambrrrr said...

I don't have a long contract I have an upfront discalimer. It goes something like: Hi _______, I'm bad with names so forgive me if I keep asking for yours. Once people get to know me I tell them about my learning disablilty. Basically I can't have more than 5 things to remember or I'll just forget one to remember the next priority.

glo said...

Nice, Amber. I may be borrowing that one.

And, MEP, thanks for the support. Glad to see you 'round here...

Johnny Menace said...

Farscape...?? That would explain the white pigment.

Kristin said...

Wow I go to bed early one night and I miss all this...yikes!

Omar, a little late...but I like the vole...he's very creative. And thanks (about the hair) my sis does a good job :)

Glo, I know it's tempting to give in...I dated a guy who had a good job, made good money, wasn't bad looking (didn't make my heart pound but I didn't throw up either) but he was sooooo boring...I'd rather be on my own...bleck.

It seems like all the good guys are married (usually with kids) but there have to be some...out there somewhere...otherwise I'm giving up shaving my legs for good!