As at least two of you know, I am a famous sociologist. My post Solving a Great Mystery of the Ages has won numerous awards, a Pulitzer, and was short-listed for a Nobel Peace Prize, due to its role in resolving the "No he didn' jus' touch me there!" subway riots last March. I did the graduation rounds, proudly receiving 4 honorary doctorates and a Mug o' Meat (from the University of Texas, of course). It's been a time of honor.
However, with honor comes expectation. My publicist, publisher, and a pub owner have all insisted I get to work on another fabulous theory explaining male behavior. With such a brilliant beginning, none of us could imagine the shame that would so soon engulf my once famous existence.
I delved into the enigmatic hidden recess of male sexuality. The research question was so fundamental that I expected a book deal, the talk show circuit and a late-night USA movie: Why do men choose the partners they choose?
It was a puzzler. I investigated pairings throughout the world. From the tall guy with super short woman to the fat woman with skinny man, I interviewed all the couples who perplex modern thought - even Josie and the pussycat. Then I turned to history. As with my discovery of the reasons behind breast fondling, I expected the anthropologic record to hold the secret.
The Eureka! moment came not long after I began my investigation of 3rd century Mongolia. "I have found it!" I yelled to my little cat, who had stretched out unashamedly in a typically male fashion. "Men choose partners based on who their friends would find attractive!"
Immediately, my forehead furrowed as I recognized the circular logic. I pulled out my charts. Every coupling now made sense, except that I had no predictive value! My efforts were nearly as useless as pigeon research (see note below)!
Despondent, I came home from my office in the Robinsons May shoe department. I turned up the radio and began to write depressed journal entries about the woes of science.
My roommate had been sighing about the house for several days. Seeing my equivalent mood, she decided to share.
"Is he ever going to ask me out?" she whined a bit.
"Who?" I'm a really caring roommate, so I had no idea she was in love. "The guy who fixed your computer?"
She nodded. "Nope," I responded. "You're out of the sex pool."
"What?! But he's here ALL the time. We talk constantly! We get each other! It's just like Two Weeks Notice!"
"Silly rabbit. Flix are for girls," I explained. "He fixed your computer while you sat on the bed. He barely looked at you. Then he took your car to the shop rather than pretend he could fix it himself. Very asexual behavior. I'm a famous sociologist. You should believe me."
"So, whose sex pool am I in, then?" she replied haughtily. People get so offended by scientific fact.
"Don't know. My theory doesn't have predictive value."
She huffed off. An hour later, I was watching Anti-Social, the cable network for scientists, when the story broke.
"Next on Somewhere! Famed sociologist, G-Lo, unable to predict male behavior." Stupid roommate sold me out for $300 and an interview with Al Roker.
A letter slid under my door, rejecting my bid for sainthood. The next thing I knew, little scientists had come to take away all my trophies, awards, and degrees. I was left with nothing but a useless theory.
I did what any red-blooded American would do. I called my publicist to schedule reality TV shows. Tune in this summer to see MC Hammer, Andy Griffith, Linda Lovelace and I struggle to run a diabetes camp in the Ozarks.
Next time, I think I'll just stick with figuring out the laws of the universe. Ever so much simpler.
Note: Polo Dude, you know I love you! Good luck with your dissertation. I'm sending good "vibes" your way.
24 comments:
I’m curious, did your research tell you anything about the flip side of that coin? I don’t think any other place/era has taught us more about life than 3rd century Mongolia… it is a veritable cornucopia of knowledge and insight.
Roommate sold you out for $300?! That's rough.
Good luck on the show. Tell Linda I said hi. She'll remember.
(and I'm no girly gardener!)
Predictive value has no value, I say. Absolutely brilliant theory!
3rd century Mongolia is a wealth of information for any study. I keep books and books on it - everything from whittling to taxodermy to VCR setting - very useful civilization.
Omar - it was Linda who called you "that girly gardener". I think that'll make the behind the scenes cut.
As for girls - do you think I'd broadcast our secrets? We're quite logical, really, but the publicity campaign "complicated" has done so much to advance our image that I can't possibly undo the hard work of generation of sister suffragettes.
man, that's too bad about the predictive value part. you'd easily put those 'he's just not that into you' people out of business.
It was a dream that will never be realized...yet, I still find "he's just not that into you" the very best piece of advice I ever give myself. (I'm sure this would be IMPOSSIBLE to guess, but I can be a little forward...so that line has saved me from many an unpleasant moment. My mom has offered to tatto it to my forearm on several occasions - and she's generally opposed to tattoos.)
Linda wouldn't say such things about me!
And I didn't mention before, but I like how the scientists who came to take your trophies were "little."
Linda is a bit like that, man. I hate to bust it -- ha, ha. That was bad even for me.
Thanks for mentioning one of my favorite parts. One of the tragedies of blogging is that I don't get to see the reactions of the readers. I should start a egocentric little poll after each post:
"Which joke did you most enjoy?"
"Which joke was most tasteless?"
"What would you like to see more in this blog?"
"Apart from the writing/writer, what would you like to see less?"
I hate it when I can’t think of anything to say… if only I could post a picture of me with a semi constipated look on my face to convey how I truly feel at this moment instead of this lame comment… then I’d really be getting somewhere…
I’m going to go watch the 4th quarter of game 7 of the NBA championships and hope that after 5 overtime periods the game ends in a tie and they have no choice but to award the championship to the last team to three-peat…
a diabetes camp in the ozarks?! you kill me.
jon - oh, no you didn' jus' reference the Lakers on my blog! So not happenin', man! This is a Lakers-free zone. Now say you're sorry and that you'll pay more attention to the Rockets in the future...
jas - Thanks, chica. I have a post planned just for you if I can ever get hello! to work. Stay posted...
Oh yes I did! What are you going to do about it? (if you heard me say this in person with my voice all cracking and my stubby little arms flailing about on my grossly undersized body, this would not really come across as a threat)
I’ll bet I pay more attention to the Rockets than you do anyway. T-Mac and my little Ming Ming anchored my fantasy basketball team this past year.
And now you've converted into Vern Troyer....I can't keep up with all these image changes...
I'm so proud of your team. And I am off to research the R-A-M-S...
I have no problem with egocentric polls. Or blogs. Anything, really. It's all about me.
Then how will it be about me?
This is the true conundrum of my existence.
Will begin plotting post about egocentric polls...
This can work. See, you write and make egocentric polls about you. That'll feed your egocentric needs. I'll tell myself that you're doing all that to please me, which will fill my egocentric needs. Everybody wins. Or at least, I do.
I see how this comes together for at least the 2 of us....now if we can convince other people all my self-centered behavior is really for *their* benefit, then my blog will rule the world!
Inherent in this attitude is the notion that it doesn't matter to me if other people's egocentric needs are met. So while I applaud your effort to reach blog supremacy, I can't help you, simply because it's not about me.
(I bet I would have been a good writer for Dawson's Creek. Too bad that run ended.)
Can I get this blog in an audio version? To be read by you, of course...I just don't get the full gist of it by reading it.
Must read again...see if it sinks in this time.
I can be so oblivious sometimes.
you guys really would have been good on dawson's creek. though glo, we'd need a little more nervous lip chewing from you and omar, how about more eyebrow activity on your end.
i'm still hoping to meet people in real life who interact like the Gilmore Girls. don't think it's gonna happen.
Omar - I dashed off a quick comment to thank you for your effort on Dawson's Creek before I realized it was you - that's how close you came to story dialogue there.
sam - release yourself from logical though and it will come to you. Think nonsense.
cadiz12 - have the nervous lip biting. You just can't see it. And I also have a secret fantasy to be Lorelai Gilmore one day...stick around, some of this dialogue comes pretty close...
For all the complaining I do about you west coast people commenting all in the middle of the night, I figure I should acknowledge that I found the amount of commenting you did today completely satisfactory.
So glad. It was all for you. Everything I do, omar, is all about you. ;)
Post a Comment